IF
THE SHOE FITS…
The
way people run varies considerably and a shoe that’s right for one person can
cause another blisters, musculoskeletal strains or joint inflammation. Twenty
years ago, the only criteria for buying sneakers was ensuring that the toes
didn’t jam against the end of the toe box. Today however, shoe design has
become quite sophisticated with a wide variety of choices available. It has
become necessary for physical therapists to assess foot biomechanics and running
style in order to provide the patient with helpful information in choosing the
correct shoe.
CHECKING
THE PATIENT’S FEET
It
is important to determine if a patient is a pronator or a supinator. This can be
done by drawing a line bisecting the Achilles tendon and the calcaneus. The
alignment of these marks is evaluated with the patient in standing. If the
calcaneal line tilts medially then the foot has a tendency to pronate.
Conversely, if the calcaneal line tilts laterally then the foot has a tendency
to supinate[20].
Another
clinical technique use to determine foot posture is to palpate the talar dome.
This is done with the patient standing. If the talus is more palpable medially
then the foot is in a pronated position, if
the lateral aspect of the talus is more palpable the foot is in a supinated
position.
CHECKING
THE WEAR PATTERN OF THE PATIENT’S SHOES
A
running shoe, when placed on a flat level surface should not be biased medially
or laterally. The main purpose of the shoe is to hold the foot stable. It should
be constructed so its upper, midsole and outsole is firmly attached (Figure
1). The uppers, heel counter and the sole should be straight. The shoes
should not rock from side to side and the shock absorbing pockets should resist
collapsing under load. Defective or worn out shoes which don’t hold feet in a
neutral position may accentuate a preexisting musculoskeletal imbalance (i.e.
excessive pronation or supination). This may lead to unnecessary aches and pains
and, if not treated, a more serious or permanent injury.
The
importance of carefully inspecting running shoes for manufacturer’s defects
before purchase, and regular checks for uneven or excessive wear
throughout the life of the shoe can not be overemphasized. The following
guidelines will help the athlete avoid buying defective running shoes and may
prevent unnecessary injuries.
The
shoe should be glued together securely. Test this by holding the shoe and trying
to pull the upper part of the shoe away from the midsole, and the midsole from
the outsole (Figure 2). Any
separation will weaken the shoe’s support.
The
upper part of the shoe should be glued straight into the sole. Test this by
putting the shoe on a level surface and inspect the back of the shoe (Figure
3A). The heel counter should appear even and should not lean to the right (Figure
3B) or left. A brand new shoe that leans medially or laterally could cause
injury especially if there is a large asymmetry between each shoe of a pair.
The
sole of the shoe should be level to the surface on which the shoe is resting.
Test this by checking that the medial and lateral aspect of the heel is even
when resting on a flat, level
surface (Figure 4A and B).
Compare each shoe individually, then compare the right to the left shoe for
symmetry. An asymmetry of two millimeters can tilt the shoe in or out
significantly.
Test
for asymmetry by applying a downward medial and a downward lateral force to both
the right and the left shoe to see if the shoe rocks medially and/or laterally
(Figure 5A and B). Check for
this asymmetry from side to side within each shoe. The shoes should remain even
and not roll. If they roll when they are new, they will not stop the foot from
rolling excessively when worn, and can cause injury.
Air
pockets and gel pockets must be inflated evenly. Test this by pushing on the
sides of the air pockets medial to lateral, and lateral to medial to check for
symmetry of inflation (Figure 6).
Push down into the air pockets both medially and laterally from the top of the
pocket (Figure 7A and B). If
the pockets are inflated unevenly, this may cause the shoe to collapse unevenly,
and the foot to roll when it hits the ground.
THE
LIFE OF THE SHOE…
A
good running shoe lasts, on average, about 300 – 500 miles. The mileage could
be less if the shoes get wet in a hot, humid environment or from running in the
rain. The average runner who runs 30 miles per week with normal wear and tear
can expect to have a shoe life of about 10 – 15 weeks. It is a good idea to
put a date somewhere on the shoes to track how long they’ve been in use. Shoes
should also be checked periodically for signs of premature wear since shoes that
are no longer in alignment cannot keep the foot and leg in a neutral position.
With
long distance runners, mileage increases dramatically while they are training
for a competitive event. However, it is not unusual for shoe models to be
discontinued and a favorite shoe may suddenly become unavailable. So, it makes
sense to buy an extra pair before a long training program, and put 40 to 50 dry
miles on them. This will break the shoes in and this pair can then be put away
in the closet until the big race.
PRICE
DOES NOT ALWAYS DETERMINE QUALITY…
The
principal author, in conjunction with a feature story for a local television
station, examined a variety of shoes (all different brands and styles) from
several different sporting goods stores. The result was an alarming 30 – 50%
defective rate. Surprisingly, more expensive shoes did not necessarily mean
better built shoes. Even the most expensive designer brand running shoes were
not exempt from a number of manufacturer’s defects.
SUMMARY…
The
type of running shoe worn by an athlete can be a very important factor in the
prevention and treatment of lower extremity overuse running injuries. Our
experience indicates the importance of checking the construction of the
patient’s running shoes as a possible cause of injury, particularly when other
more common factors are eliminated by clinical evaluation and assessment.
Additionally,
when defective or excessively worn shoes are found to be the cause of any
injury, it is vital that the clinician educate the patient as to the nature of
the problem. Knowing the difference between poor and good athletic shoe
construction and carefully checking running shoes for manufacturer’s defects
prior to purchase will prevent unnecessary injury to the patient who runs
frequently for exercise or competition.
#
# #
# #
AMAA
member, Bruce Wilk, is a board certified orthopedic physical therapist and
director of Orthopedic Rehabilitation Specialists. William Gutierrez is a board
certified orthopedic physical therapist and certified athletic trainer at
Orthopedic Rehabilitation Specialists. Orthopedic Rehabilitation Specialists is
located at 8720 North Kendall Drive, Suite 206 Miami Florida 33176, and can be
reached by calling (305) 595-9425 or at ORS@icanect.net .
References:
[1] Arnheim DD: Modern principles of athletic training, St. Louis, MO: Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing, 1989.
[2] Hall SJ, Messier SP: Biomechanics of fitness exercises. In: Durstine JL (ed), King AC (ed), Painter PL (ed), Roitman JL (ed), Zwiren LD (ed), ASCM’s Resource Manual for Guidelines for Exercise Testing & Prescription (2nd ed), pp. 38-47. Indianapolis, IN: ACSM, Lea & Febiger, 1993.
[3] Cavanagh PR, Lafortune MA: Ground reaction forces in distance running. J Biomech 13:397-406, 1980.
[4] Heil B: Lower limb biomechanics related to running injuries. Physiother 78(6):400-406, 1992.
[5] Pink MM, Jobe FW: The foot/shoe interface. In: Guten, GN (ed), Running Injuries, pp. 20-29. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company, 1997.
[6] Engsberg JR, Andrews JG: Kinematic analysis of the talocalcaneal/talocrural joint during running support. Med Sci Sports Exerc 19(3):275-284, 1987.
[7] Roy S: How I manage plantar fasciitis. Phys Sportsmed 11(10):127-131, 1983.
[8] Hall SJ, Messier SP: Biomechanics of fitness exercises. In: Durstine JL (ed), King AC (ed), Painter PL (ed), Roitman JL (ed), Zwiren LD (ed), ASCM’s Resource Manual for Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (2nd ed), pp. 38-47. Indianapolis, IN: ACSM, Lea & Febiger, 1993.
[9] Eggold JF: Orthotics in the prevention of runners’ overuse injuries. Phys Sportsmed 9(3):125-131, 1981.
[10] Frey C: Helping the athletic woman find a shoe that fits. J Muskuloskel Med 15(3):35-45, 1998.
[11] Hunt GC (ed): Physical therapy of the foot and ankle. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone Inc., 1988.
[12] Gross MT: Lower quarter screening for skeletal malalignment-suggestions for orthotics and shoewear. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 21(6):389-405, 1995.
[13]James SL, Bates BT, Osternig LR: Injuries to runners. Am J Sports Med 6(2):40-50, 1978.
[14] Stacoff A, Denoth J, Kaelin X, Stuessi E: Running injuries and shoe construction: some possible relationships. Int J Sport Biomech 4:342-357, 1988.
[15] Novacheck TF: The biomechanics of running and sprinting. In: Guten, GN (ed), Running Injuries, pp. 4-19, Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company, 1997.
[16] Heil B: Running shoe design and selection related to lower limb biomechanics. Physiother 78(6):406-412, 1992.
[17] Clarke TE, Frederick EC, Hamill CL: The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15(5):376-381, 1983.
[18] Martin DR: How to steer patients toward the right sport shoe. Phys Sportsmed 25(9):138-144, 1997.
[19] McPoil TG: Footwear. Phys Ther 68(12):1857-1865, 1988.
[20] Fromherz WA: Examination. In: Hunt GC, M.A., P.T. (ed), Physical therapy of the foot and ankle, pp. 75-79. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1988.